Opportunity Sites / Action Areas in Bermondsey as identified in the “LONG LANE MASTERPLAN” of June 2012 drawn up by the ‘Bermondsey Neighbourhood Forum’.
Neighbourhood Development
A developers view of London.
How developers and builders view London, an ad from Redrow for the development at One Commercial Street:
The New Southwark Plan
The Council is reviewing the Southwark Plan and Core Strategy to prepare a local plan called the New Southwark Plan. This new plan will set out a regeneration strategy for the next 10-15 years and will be used to make decisions on planning applications.
Download the New Southwark Plan
The first draft of the New Southwark Plan, consultation plan, consultation report and Cabinet report can be downloaded here
The revised parking standards consultation leaflet (referenced in DM15-DM18 of the current version of the New Southwark Plan: Issues and Options) can be downloaded here
Consultation
We are really keen to understand what you think is important about the places where you live, work and visit, so the Council is undertaking a thorough consultation process to make sure we get it right.
We carried out an initial consultation on the local high street earlier this year. Our consultation report summarises the questionnaire responses.
The New Southwark Plan went to Cabinet on 21 October 2014 and was approved to go out to consultation.
The consultation period will run from 31 October 2014 to 6 March 2015.
Please contact the planning policy team if you have any questions on tel: 020 7525 4530 or email planningpolicy@southwark.gov.uk
-
London Bridge
Thursday 12 February 2015, 6:30pm – 8:30pm at Southwark Council offices, 160 Tooley Street SE1 2TZ.
Protecing Our Neighbourhood From Developers Through A Community Forum.
The whole of our estate could be under immediate threat from property developers. Development may bring some benefits but may cost you your car parking, communal gardens or even your home. If the estate is redeveloped and you are a tenant is is very unlikely that you would be re-housed in the same neighbourhood.
If you are a leaseholder, under Compulsory Purchase you may not receive the market value of your home. In the Heygate estate, many displaced residents were left unable to afford to live anywhere in London. Leaseholders on the Heygate and Aylesbury estates who have been offered 1/2 the value of their homes have had to go to court over this.
The council has been building some homes for rental but very few. This is a drop in the ocean with regard to the needs of the local community.
Chaucer Ward – new build hotspot.
In 2014 Estate agents Sterling Ackroyd highlighted our ward Chaucer as the number 1 “New Build Hotspot” in Greater London. They claim that right here developers could build 2865 new homes per square kilometre. There is no record of Southwark Council’s response to this report but you can guess that none of the new homes will be for residents of Borough or Tabard Gardens.
Read the report here: https://tabardnorth.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/doc049.pdf
When Section 106 (planning gain) funds have been made available from developers e.g. The Shard, none of the money has gone to local residents. Land values in our neighbourhood have gone up dramatically since developers (The Shard etc.) have moved in.
What Can We Do?
The Localism Act 2011 has given local residents new planning rights. We have the power to put forward a Neighbourhood Plan which may not be the same as the council’s plan. If recognised, we would entitled to government funding under the “Supporting Communities in Neighbourhood Planning”. We would have a “right to build” homes, community centres, playgrounds, facilities for the elderly etc.
Southwark Residents Say No – Saving Southwark
We love Southwark and value the friendly, co-operative, supportive nature of our community.
But now we feel that our neighbourhood is under threat.
Many residents, individuals and groups, are deeply worried about the planning policies of Southwark Council.
Far too many tower blocks are being given planning consent. Many loved and valued older buildings have been destroyed, or are scheduled for demolition.
These policy decisions threaten to break up our community and destroy our neighbourhood.
The groups and individuals listed here are committed to making their feelings clear to Southwark Council, and to campaigning against these damaging policies.
https://twitter.com/savingsouthwark/media
Chaucer Ward – new build hotspot. Download available.
Download the scanned report: New Build Bible
Proposed changes in the Elephant & Castle area
We would like your views on designs for a new public square at Elephant & Castle.
The proposal includes transforming the area to include five new public spaces, improved interchange between Tube, rail and bus services as well as safer access to the area for pedestrians and cyclists.
For full details and to have your say, please visit tfl.gov.uk/elephant
This consultation will close on Monday 22 December 2014.
UPDATE – BVAG/BNF Neighbourhood Plan – Watershed Meeting
UPDATE 12Th NOVEMBER – The Bermondsey Neighbourhood Forum are now taking no part in this meeting and will be making their own decisions on their future.
Wednesday 12 November at 7.00 pm
Doors open 6.30
Globe House 37 Bermondsey St
——————————————————————————–
This meeting will determine who is to promote a neighbourhood plan for our area and what policies will go into it. Come if you care.
The meeting will be chaired by Grange ward councillor, Damian O’Brien.
Agenda:
Community Plan
1. Introduction.
2. Presentation of BNF proposal.
3. Presentation of St Thomas St plan/BVAG proposal.
4. Questions from the meeting at large on either or both proposals.
5. Meeting to select one or other proposal and determine consequential matters.
Neighbourhood Plan Meeting Wednesday 12th November at 7.00 pm
Message from BVAG (Bermondsey Village Action Group · 14 Crucifix Lane · London Bridge · London, London SE1 3JW)
“Neighbourhood Plan – Watershed Meeting Wednesday 12 November at 7.00 pmGlobe HouseAs most of our followers are very aware, Southwark Council have been doing whatever they can to prevent local people from having the power to influence local planning policy that is conferred upon us by the Localism Act. The reasons are also well known: They have plans for St Thomas St and its immediate surroundings that they don’t want local people having anything to do with. Those plans are exemplified by the history of the fantasy ‘Quill’ building in St Thomas St.
Plan A for stopping us was simply to delay for two or three years in processing our application. That works well for as long they can pull it off: Challenging the delay in court would simply increase the effectiveness of their tactic because of the delay in the courts themselves. And what court would reject their defence that they are simply incompetent and inefficient, rather than perverse?
As central government started to recognise how easily local authorities can undermine neighbourhood planning through delay, the Council has had to resort to Plan B. This was to refuse our application for recognition as a Neighbourhood Forum and instead designate an area for which there is no applicant group.
The planners have of course always known that eventually plan A would become unsustainable and hence they were well prepared with plan B. They have always pretended there were such entrenched divisions within the community that – being exemplars of harmony and collaboration – they could not with clear conscience approve any application. Of course, nobody believes this either but the beauty of being in power is that you can do what you want with any lame excuse until a court stops you.
Faced with the prospect of plan B buying them another couple of years of delay, the community needs to bury the charade it relies upon: divisions in the neighbourhood. To put this line to bed once and for all and to allow the community to have at least some local plan, the two ‘groups’ that the Council uses for its ‘divisions’ line have agreed to hold a combined meeting at which their own members and the community at large can select one group to go forward.
Next Wednesday’s meeting will therefore give the community the chance to unlock community planning in our area by selecting either the St Thomas St Plan (coordinated by BVAG) or the Bermondsey Neighbourhood Forum as their preferred applicant for designation. The other group will then be formally wound up by its members. Once they can no longer plead paralysing divisions in the community the Council will have no alternative but to approve a local planning group and it will finally be possible to produce a local plan for our area.
For complete independence the meeting will be chaired by Grange ward councillor, Damian O’Brien.
Come and have your say; finally it will be decisive”



